tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820750.post7605314413055403355..comments2009-07-02T09:45:56.222-05:00For Peter's Sakehttps://profiles.google.com/105288549341743455033noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820750.post-67083330175897082172009-07-02T09:45:56.222-05:002009-07-02T09:45:56.222-05:00What a shame. I'd love to see more documentation. Got any friends at USPO that deal with dance apparatuses? :-)Peterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10845310999741739328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10820750.post-27835088733750177682009-07-01T16:31:57.466-05:002009-07-01T16:31:57.466-05:00That's pretty sweet. Too bad the case file hasn't been digitized; I could order it out of the archives, but I have the feeling that someone up the chain would go "WTF is a bioinformatics examiner doing with a dance apparatus case file?" and then I'd get in trouble. And it doesn't look like there'd be very much of interest in the file anyway. It looks like the case got a "first action allowance", which means that there isn't a fun paper trail of arguments between the examiner and an attorney to go read through. It's kinda like the DA dropping all charges at the arraignment hearing.Sorenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09127721889533199793noreply@blogger.com